![]() |
|
Russian Fighter Aircraft
The Lavochkin LAGG-3, a refined version of the LaGG-1,
still suffered from a number of faults. Some of these were cured by the
introduction of a more powerful Klimov M-105P engine. There were also
changes to the structure, with a lighter airframe and the introduction
of improved wing slats and elevators. The LaGG-3 entered service in the
early months of 1941 and was rapidly produced until mid-1942. Despite
the changes made, the aircraft was under powered, suffered from poor manoeuvrability,
had a bounce-inducing undercarriage and in the early stages suffered from
poor production quality. Despite these failings, the LAGG-3 proved to
be a durable fighter and its resistance to combat damage was a large factor
of its relative success.
The La-5 was introduced in July 1942. It was rapidly developed
and quickly put into production to replace the LAGG-3. The fuselage and
wing construction were the same as that of the LaGG-3, but the standard
hunchback style canopy was replaced with a new bubble canopy with front
and rear armoured glass. The expensive delta-timber used for structural
construction was replaced with more common pine and from 1944 all wing
spars were made of metal. The aircraft was reliable, highly manoeuvrable
and the pilot had excellent visibility from the cockpit. It had excellent
structural mounting points and an ingenious fire-fighting system, which
diverted the exhaust gases into the fuel tanks. However the aircraft's
excessive weight did reduce the engines effectiveness. An improved version,
the La-5F, was introduced in December 1942 and was fitted with a modified
radial M-82F engine to improve performance. The final version, the La-5FN
was introduced in July 1943. The La-5FN was equipped with a more powerful,
fuel injected M-82FN engine. In addition to its modernised power plant,
the La-5FN had lighter landing gear, better cockpit insulation and reduced
control column and rudder pedal resistance.
The final version in this series, the La-7 was introduced in mid 1944 and remained in service until the end of the war. It was fitted with a Shvetsov radial engine, which increased its speed over the La-5. Armament was also increased to three ShVak 20mm cannons. The La-5 was constructed primarily of wood yet proved to be surprisingly resistant to damage. While it did not perform as well as some other Russian designs, it did provide a stopgap until sufficient numbers of better performing fighters could be produced. Later development of the type included the addition of a radial engine, which increased speed and performance.
The MiG-1 was introduced following a requirement issued
in 1938, for a high-altitude interceptor. The Mikoyan-Gurevich Design
Bureau built the aircraft around the AM-35A engine, which despite being
very powerful, was also excessively heavy. This dictated many of the design
features as the designers were forced to over compensate for the heavy
engine. This flaw was compounded by the extensive use of wood, due to
the shortage of steel and light alloys.
Production of the I-16 began in late 1934 and the aircraft
entered service the following year. At low speed the aircraft was difficult
and unstable to fly and was awkward to land. Nicknamed Yastreb (Hawk)
and Mushka (Fly) by its pilots it was initially extremely unpopular. German
pilots nickname it the Rata (Rat). In 1937 the aircraft was fitted with
a more powerful M-25A engine, which failed to provide any significant
increase in speed due to the additional weight of structural strengthening
which had also taken place. In early 1938 the engine was further upgraded,
this time with the M-25V. Again performance was virtually unchanged apart
from a slight improvement in rate of climb. As well as the new engine,
a pair of nose mounted ShKAS mg's were added to the aircraft. Also in
1938 production of the I-16 type 17 began. This variant was armed with
two 20mm ShVAK canons mounted in the wings and two ShKAS mg's mounted
in the nose. The type 17 was designed as a ground attack aircraft and
could also carry a bomb load of up to 200kg (441lb) on under wing racks.
The Yak-1 entered production in May 1940. The aircraft was designed to be as simple to manufacture as possible, while still retaining the robust strength that had always characterised Russian aircraft. The aircraft had simple controls and good flight performance, making familiarisation for new pilots easier. In June 1941 the aircraft underwent a series of upgrades, including the introduction of an improved engine, the M-105PF and a reduction in the weight of the airframe. These improvements increased the speed to 413mph (505kmh) and improved the rate of climb and turn. Production was halted in September 1941 while the facilities were evacuated east and it was February 1942 before production resumed. This reduced the number of aircraft of this type available and during the restarting of production initially reduced the build quality. In the early war years its high manoeuvrability and strong armament allowed it to perform reasonably well. In early 1943 the Yak-1M was introduced, which included a number of improvements. The pilots vision was improved with the introduction of a three piece transparent hood at the rear of the cockpit. Other features introduced were an increased wing span to improve flight stability and a new propeller. Production of the Yak-1 was phased out in mid 1943 in favor of the Yak -3.
Yak 3
Production of the Yak-3 began in April 1943 and gradually
replaced that of the Yak-1. The aircraft had excellent flight performance
at low altitude, often out performing the Bf-109 and Fw-190 in turns.
It was the lightest, most manoeuvrable fighter to see action in the eastern
theatre, born of the Russian need for an easily and cheaply produced fighter,
which did not require the scarce raw materials used in other designs.
However it was difficult to control at low speeds and the undercarriage
often proved unreliable. In the autumn of 1944 the Yak-3U was fitted with
an improved engine, the M-107A, which increased speed to 447mph (715kmh)
and improved the rate of climb. The cockpit was moved back slightly to
accommodate the new engine. Several variants were introduced in
an effort to improve the aircraft's armament. The Yak-3P was fitted with
three 20mm B20 canon and the Yak-3T's nose fitted B20 canon was replaced
with one 37mm NS-37 canon. The Yak-3 remained in production until after
the end of the war. Yak-7
The Yak-7 entered production in July 1941 and was originally
designed as a twin seat training aircraft, with a second cockpit added
aft of the original one and an increased wing span. However although it
was similar in design to the Yak-1, its flight performance was superior.
It was decided to revert the aircraft back to a single seater and the
second cockpit space was filled with an auxiliary fuel tank. The two-seat
version remained in service as a training aircraft and was also used in
the reconnaissance role. In mid 1942, following combat experience, an
improved version, the Yak-7B was introduced. It was fitted with improved
radio equipment, a jettisonable cockpit canopy and a strengthened undercarriage.
In late 1942 a further variant was introduced, the Yak-7D. It incorporated
an improved wing design, which saw steel alloy construction replace timber.
This reduced the aircraft's weight and allowed an increase in the size
of the wing tankage. Production of the Yak-7 ended in early 1943.
The Yak-9, introduced in October 1942, was the mainstay
of the Red Air Force in the middle and late years of WWII and was produced
in greater numbers than any other Russian fighter. It was an improved
version of the Yak-7D and featured a number of minor improvements over
its predecessor. It was also lighter, despite increased wing tankage and
although this increased its range, the overall flight performance was
not greatly improved. The deletion of the starboard gun to help achieve
the reduction in weight brought complaints from pilots that the aircraft
was under armed. Nevertheless, it was a formidable fighter, particularly
at low altitudes. It was manoeuvrable and also durable, capable of absorbing
considerable battle damage. However it had a slow rate of climb and performed
poorly at high altitude. In May 1943, some aircraft suffered from the
skin on the wings separating from the airframe in flight. An investigation,
launched after Stalin's personal intervention, found that the sealant
used seal the skin was not waterproof, causing it to swell when wet and
then contract when dry, resulting in it becoming seriously weakened.
|